The use of live animals in controlled laboratory tests is common place the world over this debate aims to lay out the argument both for and against animal experiments have good medical progress due to the conflicting results, caused by species-variation, they provide don’t get me wrong, i totally disagree with cosmetic testing. Whether they realize it or not, most stakeholders in the debate about using animals for research agree on the common goal of seeking an end to research that causes animals harm  the central issues in the controversy are about how much effort should be devoted to that goal and when we might reasonably expect to achieve it. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study this approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments. Critically evaluate the decision to conduct research with human subjects both the spirit of the regulations and good science require that individuals give thoughtful consideration to the decision to conduct research with human subjects. Animal testing: pros and cons animal testing introduction the application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to pharmaceutical products has been considered to be a normal strategy for many years.
Scientists use animals to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals, and to assure the safety of new medical treatments animals are necessary to medical research when it is impractical or unethical to use humans animals make good research subjects for a variety of reasons animals are biologically similar to humans. Medical research is an arduous process by the time a therapy reaches the patient, it is easy to forget just how important animals were in its development. The national health & medical research council’s code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes 10 the basis for all practices and procedures. Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research early greek physician-scientists, such as aristotle, (384 – 322 bc) and erasistratus, (304 – 258 bc), performed experiments on living animals.
The suffering of animals used in medical research is not contested, although the scale of it often is however, views diverge sharply on whether animal experimentation is part of good science and results in medical breakthroughs for humans, or whether such progress could have been achieved by other means. Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous the harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, hiv, parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research they are crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and health, and for developing new medicines the use of animals in scientific research has long been the subject of heated debate on the one. Background and context animal testing or animal research is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation it is estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide — from zebrafish to non-human primates — are used annually.
Millions of rats, mice, rabbits, dogs, cats, etc, are tested upon in laboratories, for cosmetic and medical research every year while animal rights activists strongly oppose animal experimentation for the benefit of mankind, medical researchers strongly claim that animal testing has spearheaded. - research is responsible for virtually all the medical breakthroughs there have been- there are medicines and vaccines and cures and treatments and more life saving benefits being developed today- but an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Tia has interned at science news, wiredcom, and the milwaukee journal sentinel and has written for the center for investigative reporting, scientific american, and sciencenow.
One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the nature vs nurture debate each of these sides have good points that it's really hard to decide whether a person's development is predisposed in his dna, or a majority of it is influenced by this life experiences and his environment. All in all, it can be said that using animals for medical research is ethical a long as it contributes to scientific development and helps scientists find ways to improve human health and this practice is only acceptable on the condition that necessary pains are taken and animals are treated humanely. Nazi medical experimentation: the ethics of using medical data from nazi experiments like animal experiments and medical records of workers accidentally exposed to the gas to date, it is unclear whether the nazi human data would have predicted a different dose-response effect compared to the animal research the debate over the.
Many medical research institutions make use of non-human animals as test subjects animals may be subject to experimentation or modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human disease or for testing potential human treatments. Animal research has had a vital role in many scientific and medical advances of the past century and continues to aid our understanding of various diseases throughout the world, people enjoy a better quality of life because of these advances, and the subsequent development of new medicines and. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united states for scientific and commercial testing animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses.